Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (10): 3315-3328.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.00571

Previous Articles    

Identification of consolidation model parameters using spatiotemporally varying pore water pressure measurements

ZHAN Run-tao1, 2, YIN Xiao-meng1, 3   

  1. 1. College of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang, Henan 464000, China 2. Henan Unsaturated Soil and Special Soil Engineering Technology Research Center, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang, Henan 464000, China 3. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Hubei University of Arts and Science, Wuhan, Hubei 441053, China
  • Online:2025-10-11 Published:2025-10-20
  • About author:ZHAN Runtao, male, born in 1977, PhD, lecturer, focusing on inverse problem in geotechnical engineering and soil-structure interaction. E-mail: zrt@xynu.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41807240) and the Nature Science Foundation of Hubei Province (2023AFB607).

Abstract: The study applies the least squares technique in conjunction with a series of spatiotemporally varying pore water pressure measurements to identify the geotechnical parameters of consolidation models. Firstly, a least squares function for pore water pressure, incorporating both temporal and spatial coordinates, is developed. Subsequently, a new Jacobian matrix is constructed to accommodate any number of temporal and spatial measurements. Using Taylor series expansion, the iterative equations for the Gauss-Newton, Levenberg, Marquardt, and Nielsen methods are derived. The proposed methods are validated using two numerical examples. In Case 1, the consolidation coefficient of Terzaghi’s model is identified. Comparative analysis reveals that all four methods converge to the correct solution, although the Marquardt method converges more slowly. In Case 2, the coordinates of a point source in a two-dimensional fluid-saturated medium are identified using a poroelastic consolidation model. The Gauss-Newton method fails to accurately locate the point source, whereas the Nielsen method accelerates convergence but introduces multiple damping coefficient intervals and convergence values. The Marquardt method is more effective for point source identification. Additionally, the study highlights the importance of sensor placement and initial iteration coordinates for accurate point source identification. Both cases show that the proposed methods possess some noise resistance.

Key words: consolidation, least square problem, Gauss-Newton method, Levenberg-Marquardt method, sensor layout